Environmental protection chief can't prove anything without wearing a mask

Outspoken

In view of the frequent pollution days in Beijing, many citizens are concerned that Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Commissioner Chen Tim also wears masks when they go out? Chen Tian said on the 15th: "I don't wear a mask and I don't have an air purifier at home." He said that 70% of PM2.5 is caused by human activities. I hope that the public can start from their own responsibility and take up their responsibility. .


The Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau official stated that “I don’t wear masks” and the signals passed out are neither very relevant to the environmental quality of the Beijing Municipality nor the physical quality of the Secretary to be able to resist haze damages. Power self-confidence - hope that through their own non-masks affect more people pay attention to environmental protection, and in exchange for the blue sky clear water.

If the Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Commissioner does not wear masks to indicate a gesture, the former vice minister of the Ministry of Health, Huang Jiefu, “I don’t wear a mask” is a popularization of scientific knowledge. According to him, wearing a normal mask is ineffective, PM2.5 is very small, ordinary masks can only block large particles such as PM10, can only make some psychological comfort, the key is to make the environment better, especially indoor Air purification.

When wearing masks became a kind of psychological comfort for the public, and when they did not wear masks, they became a kind of “inspirational power” for officials. However, we were indeed touched by the spirit of sacrifice, but we were saddened by their overconfidence. Since the treatment of environmental pollution is not overnight and requires the concerted efforts of the whole society, according to the current problems, how to enable citizens to travel relatively safely is not simply a question of wearing no masks.

The governance ideas of officials must not only fall on everyone's joint efforts, but also must consider how everyone can better protect themselves. On the one hand, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the public should wear a mask or not, and how to wear a mask is more effective; on the other hand, it might be better to put down the shelves and wear a mask on their own. In particular, it is necessary to bus with the public instead of using buses or buses. Stay in the office, otherwise you will lose the demonstration without wearing a mask.

Indeed, each and every one of us must assume our responsibility for environmental protection. But as an official, if you don't wear a mask, you really can't say anything, and you can't produce a demonstration effect. Instead, it is doing something useful that only people can expect. For example, to reduce bus travel, wear masks and crowded buses with the public; and, for example, to feel even more deeply the fact that citizens wear masks but have little practical effect, and they really do a lot of hard work to strengthen environmental governance, even There is no shortage of "no" to those large environmental-polluter households and government tax collectors.... Only the government can really work hard to bring the people together and finally usher in a good environment without having to worry about whether or not to wear a mask.

Copyright Statement: This article is reproduced from online media and represents only the author's opinion. It has nothing to do with this site. If news articles and comments infringe your legal rights, please call us and we will handle it in a timely manner.